I don’t think this means anything except that McCain probably has PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) from his days when he was in a POW camp and had to make propaganda tapes for the other prisoners in the camp (I’m not saying that what McCain did in the POW camp was bad — he was probably doing it for survival, and who knows what ANY of us would do in that situation, but this is probably why he called Americans “my fellow prisoners”).
I actually feel bad for the old guy. I also recently read somewhere that John McCain drinks an energy drink that those with Alzheimer’s also drink. I read it here: “McCain taking “energy” supplement also used for Alzheimer’s and dementia“. I don’t know if it’s true or not (all though it does provide a source), and even if it IS true, I don’t know if this supplement is used with people who don’t have dementia and Alzheimer’s as well, and just happens to be an option for the ones who suffer with those diseases to just try.
But McCain is old… Maybe too old to be in office?
Either way. I feel very bad for him. I feel bad especially at the end when he’s smiling proudly when the crowd is chanting… That man, regardless of whether we agree with his politics or not, DID serve his country… I don’t want him in office, but I did see him as totally human here, as opposed to before. This poor man.
He shouldn’t be president. He needs to live out his days in a stress free environment.
I see him as being used. He’s THIS old, and most likely being used. Probably with good intentions in his heart too. This poor guy… This is heart breaking. This poor old man is damaged. And probably being just as much lied to and manipulated as the American people are by his handlers… And then probably laughed at behind his back by these same people, while he’s being very sincere and wanting to help the United States of America (in his own wrong, jaded way). …
… Or maybe not.
But did you guys know McCain adopted a daughter from Bangladesh? Can he be such a bad guy? I mean, I wrote a post about him from the first Presidential Debate concerning something he said about investigating 9/11:I really only have one question about the Presidential Debate tonight.
I feel TERRIBLE about it now. How do we know John McCain didn’t try to investigate what went wrong on 9/11 with pure, good intentions? I’m not saying he thought 9/11 was an inside job (I also make this clear in my other post I just linked to), but perhaps he really did think SOMETHING went wrong within our government to allow such a “blunder” and “mistake” — and it wasn’t to make himself look politically good. Could this man just be severely misguided, old, and damaged? Could he just be a puppet on the string without knowing it…?
I can’t express how badly I feel for John McCain right now.
THE VIDEO IS BELOW MY REVIEW TO WATCH and also please excuse typos and grammar errors.
“The true terrorists of our world do not meet at the docks at midnight, or scream ‘Allah Akbar’ before some violent action. The true terrorists of our world wear five thousand dollar suits, and work in the highest positions of finance, government and business.” - Peter Joseph, Zeitgeist: Addendum.
Tonight I finally saw “Zeitgeist: Addendum”, also known probably as “Zeitgeist Part 2″, by Peter Joseph. I have a very, very mixed review on it. Read below and also note:the video will be below this post and review.
This movie, unlike the first “Zeitgeist” movie, started out actually really good. Hardly any religion mentioned at all. That made me very happy, because seriously, in the first movie the parts about religion in the first “Zeitgeist” movie completely turned me off — but I trekked on and watched the rest of it, ignoring the points about religion and how the movie “Zeitgeist” attempted to interconnect the corruption in our federal and monetary system with peoples religious values.
Because, even though the first “Zeitgeist” movie stole everything from other movies and documentaries (even whole clips from other movies and quotes), it still made good points about our government and how they steal our money.
“Zeitgeist: Addendum” does the same thing — it breaks down the monetary system even further, explaining how “money = debt” (“money = debt” has become an actual term and I see people all over telling others to Google “money = debt” constantly now).
I personally was all ready informed about a LOT of this, but it’s always good to hear it again and again, in different forms, and learn it in different ways. However “Zeitgeist: Addendum” probably took from other movies, like the part about the economic hit man — I honestly don’t think that Peter Joseph actually sought that man out for a video, but probably stole it from another documentary. Just like he did in the first “Zeitgeist” movie.
And even though I personally am not a fan of that, and will like to hear things purely from the source (and this is why I promote the Aaron Russo/Alex Jones interview, that the first “Zeitgeist” movie took from), I believe that this movie at least is getting the message out to a greater audience of people, as opposed to probably the documentary featuring the Economic Hitman (which I will find what that documentary is and will probably post it here — promise!).
It also talks about free energy, and different things we can use. How the sun can power us and there are things in the earth that can also power every nation forever, and we would never have to use oil again. I’m down for all of this. Seems very kosher to me. No more blood for oil? Let’s do it. Free energy (as in completely free, and no ones making money off of it)? I’m down for it.
And what about the cars you say? How will we power the cars? “Zeitgeist: Addendum” talks about how we can have electronic and battery operated cars today — but the oil companies have patented mostly all of the of the batteries to power these cars… anyone else see ANYTHING wrong with that?
It also talks about a lot more interesting things, and gives great points, that I can’t really remember right now because I am tired LOL.
But then the movie gets weird. I also would like to admit here that Peter Joseph is clever for leaving most of the stuff he had to say about religion towards the end of the movie. But nevertheless the movie still gets weird.
At first it didn’t seem like a bad idea to me. A completely free society. A wonderful society where people enjoy life and have fun and are completely relaxed. The old man in the video, who represented The Venus Project, made a very good point: The petty, small, repetitive, boring jobs that people have to do day in and day out keeps people ignorant. Which is true. I once heard of a therapist on T.V. saying “it isn’t people who go to therapists that are crazy — it’s people who work day in and day out for forty years straight, every day doing the same thing that are the crazy ones.”(I’m paraphrasing, obviously).
And I have to tell you.. that is an absolutely true statement. When I went to school every single day for massage therapy, I really wanted to kill myself. That is not an exaggeration. How do people do it? Day in and day out, the same thing, the same day over and over again… How is this possible? Just thinking about it is eliciting some strong emotions in me right now…
So I agreed with this old man from The Venus Project. A free society, no work, no laws, machines do it all for you, everyone is stress free and we all live in harmony away from the terrorist elite that controls everything — WHERE DO I SIGN UP? All though to be perfectly honest, I think what this man was talking about is far too advanced for humans today as they are. Not technology wise, but as a mentality. I don’t really think we can. (Sorry, Obama, it turns out– No We Can’t).
And it wouldn’t be right to force us to. And believe me, I’d fight to bring down this SUPPOSEDLY wonderful society if it was forced upon ANYONE who didn’t want it forced on them. It really started to sound all most communistic in a way. It sounded like they wanted to do away with old values and old beliefs — religious systems, familial values, etc. And that’s not right. That’s what the communist’s tried to do in Russia. That’s what they want to do in the New World Order.
That’s what they did on communes in Israel (known as a Kibbutz) — where the children who grew up there had no constructive family life or parenting or anything.. and it pretty much didn’t work for the children involved. So why do away with traditional families? Why even HINT at it? The old man said how parents indoctrinate their children towards their belief systems…
And he is talking about it as if it’s negative.
This is where I started to get edgy and suspicious with the movie. If you agree with this old man, then you ALSO agree with California’s decision to stop homeschooling — when a LOT of homeschooling is done for religious purposes (check out my post about that here:Most Homeschooling in California is banned), and you also DISAGREE with Aaron Russo when he speaks negatively about how those at the top of this centuries old pyramid scheme (taking right from Peter Josephs mouth) want your children to go to state funded schools and be indoctrinated with what THEY want your children to be indoctrinated by (and it is usually anti religious — I have seen it with my own two eyes in the school system and the many many schools I have been to).
The ramifications of what this old man from The Venus Project is saying are HUGE. And also, my question is, what does he or others at The Venus Project propose we do with those who will cling onto their faith because they are so in love with their Savior? (Christians). Or their Prophet? (Muslims). Or their Messiah to come? (Jews — Ugh, yes, that’s right, I just stuck up for them in terms of their right to their religion … Even though they will never do the same for ANYONE). Or anyone who believes in any other religion?
What these people from The Venus Project have in mind for those that cling to their old beliefs, I really, honestly shudder to think.
I mean, I really wouldn’t doubt if this comes back later in time that The Venus Project was some CIA funded group or experiment — after all, they say Jonestown may have been a CIA experiment. Just remember folks: Just because it SOUNDS pretty, doesn’t mean it is.
This is where critical thinking MUST come into play.
And also remember: A person will fight for their interests before they fight for their freedoms.
But that isn’t right, and we shouldn’t be like that. Just because certain religions aren’t your interest so to speak, or even if you detest them, it is still the right of people to practice what they want. And I would fight to protect my freedoms and another persons freedoms over my own INTERESTS.
This is why I think that Peter Joseph should have seriously left anything about religion out of the movies “Zeitgeist” and “Zeitgeist: Addendum”. It really takes away ANYTHING else he has to say about the monetary system, and will turn those who HAVE a belief in God right off.
And when it gets into the New Ageism? I don’t know what else to call it BUT New Ageism, it won’t just turn people off who have a belief in God, but it will also turn off those who don’t have a spiritual bone in their body.
It takes away from the whole message. A friend, Tom, said that:
Lunatic (1:02:36 AM): they deserved to be turned off if they won’t be open-minded Lunatic (1:02:40 AM): go back to working their horrible jobs Lunatic (1:02:44 AM): and praying to god every night
But I do not agree with him. Really.. just because people are believing what they want in terms of GOD and religion, they should be RAPED by the monetary system and the Federal Government and Federal Reserve System?
Seems not fair.
I also think that this movie contradicted itself a lot. It talks about how these things that are placed upon us by the global elite are anti-American… But the Venus Project seems to want a one world type of unification… I don’t know.
I’m tired. It’s late and I guess that’s really all I had to say about this movie, “Zeitgeist: Addendum”. ACTUALLY THERE IS A TON MORE I CAN SAY ABOUT THIS MOVIE BUT I’LL LEAVE IT HERE. So I guess I suppose I’m done — thank God, right? Haha.
Oh, except one more thing, when “Zeitgeist: Addendum” was going on and on about the spiritual stuff at the end, can someone tell me WHAT THE FREEMASON HAND DIAMOND SYMBOL WAS DOING IN IT?
Okay, and NOW I’m done.
AND NOW.. WITHOUT FURTHER ADO.. HERE IS THE MOVIE, “ZEITGEIST: ADDENDUM”:
It’s a 2 hour movie, so watch it when you have a lot of time
Oh, and if you didn’t know what I was talking about about the Freemason Diamond Hand Symbol…
Well, this is not the BEST source, but watch this. It’s not just a music video, you have to actually WATCH it — when the music shuts off there is more to it.
Occult Secrets of Jay Z, Kanye & Nas
Description:“An in depth look at the very disturbing truth behind some of mainstream music’s most ‘popular’ celebrities and their occult practices.
‘What it’s about is the fact that Jigga is a Lucifer-worshiping Mason. And he’s pulled in Kanye and Nas. All the symbols are masonic/pagan/satanic especially the pink goat’s head shirt Kanye is wearing. And just listen to the song…it’s about secret societies and the satanic Illuminati which employs Jigga. Do some research…free your mind.’ -RizNJ
***TO BE HONEST I DON’T CARE ABOUT JAY-Z OR NAS BEING A MASON, THAT WASN’T THE POINT IN ME PUTTING UP THIS VIDEO…*** The point was to show people about the Masonic Diamond Hand Symbol. The same one that is in suspiciously “Zeitgeist: Addendum”. That’s it.
So, can someone honestly tell me why the Freemason Diamond Hand Symbol appears in this movie?
That’s really the only true question I have. LOL.
Anyway, comments and thoughts are welcomed as always and thanks for reading!
BY THE WAY, SORRY FOR THIS, BUT ONE MORE QUICK THING…LOL… Does anyone else feel like The Venus Project seems sort of like the DHARMA Initiative from Lost…? LOL. (By the way, that’s a joke, not really meant to be seriously contemplated or taken seriously).
OKAY SORRY. THAT’S THE LAST THING I WANTED TO SAY.
I’m in the midst of watching the presidential debate tonight. First let me just say, when Obama just now mentioned 9/11 (around 9:25 PM Eastern time?), my stomach just lurched. Now that’s what I call an emotional response to politics. I really hate the fact that most politicians keep mentioning 9/11 to further their bad points or to make them look good or to make another person look bad. Can these lying, underhanded politicians, that mostly have ulterior motives, just leave that event alone?
I know, that’s too much to ask.
Anyway, what I mentioned just now is far from an intelligent response to this debate (that isn’t over yet), and it really isn’t why I started to write this post. I just had to say it.
The reason I started to write this is because Obama mentioned how higher oil prices are a national security issue — I’m not disputing that fact at ALL. I don’t doubt that it is.
But does anyone else but me remember how Saddam wanted to give us, the United States, cheap oil? And also wanted to be our friend? It was even in an Associated Press interview, and on the front of AOLs Welcome page when that interview first came out (I mention this because I can’t find it right now, and I don’t have the patience to do so — even though I know it’s somewhere on my LJ amidst the thousands of entries I have). And yet, now he’s dead, because of the actions of the United States, and our oil has sky rocketed, and now we have to worry about the national security issues around it and finding new ways for energy.
And isn’t it funny that the second 700 billion dollar bail out (the one that went through) snuck something in there about green energy and global warming? And who knows what else was slipped in — but that’s besides the point. Except that.. what does global warming and alternative energy have to do with bad mortgages?
ANYWAY.
My point is: Something REALLY doesn’t seem right here. I mean, it doesn’t really take a genius or a rocket scientist to put two and two together, right? Some people, somewhere, are making money off of these global warming fears and the search and construction for alternative energy.
I’m BEGGING you people to be free thinkers. If something seems wrong (and especially if you have a lot of different facts, MOST politics WILL seem wrong), it most likely IS.
Also: I think Obama is doing a TON better at this debate than Maverick McCain. I mean, really, does it not seem like McCain just is throwing out random wonderful facts about himself before answering the questions? It’s like he has something to prove, and it really doesn’t make him seem like he has confidence.
Edit:
And LOL @ McCain just now getting mad that Obama for following up every time McCain says something bad about him.
Edit:
AND ALSO… AGAIN WITH THE SECOND HOLOCAUST AND THE PROTECTION OF ISRAEL…
ISRAEL HAS OVER 100 NUCLEAR WEAPONS.(And meanwhile Iran can’t have even one nuclear weapon, right?)
That country is not the victim it portrays itself to be. IT CAN TAKE CARE OF ITSELF.
Wow…
Just.
Wow.
And my question is if the presidential candidates can ignore that BIG FACT, then what else are they ignoring?
Or lying about?
These are legitimate questions and begs an answer or some serious thought.
Since October 2nd(apparently, since that’s the last time I posted - not counting the last paid post I did late last night) I haven’t even had INTEREST in going into my Wordpress admin “write” section. What is up with THAT? I’ve had a LOT to say too. Just no interest whatsoever in saying it HERE. BUT I REALIZED I CAN NOT LET A GOOD URL GO TO WASTE — And an awesome blog, too. I just need to get back into the swing of it, and find the right ways to say a LOT of stuff. Isn’t that what I always say? There’s so much to say, and not enough ways to say it. Things can get too overwhelming. Well, readers (if I have any left),… bear with me while I find these ways — or at least take from other peoples mouths and quote it here (because, as stated before, usually what I post is exactly what I know unless stated otherwise — only it’s said in a much better, much more professional way).
So dear friends, the first order of business:
The economy. Not just ours, no. The world economy is in turmoil. And where did I hear this? Where do I get these sources? Not from conspiracy websites or other blogs — no. That would be too whack job and tin foil hat of me. I’m getting my info. from the news (and, coincidentally, so does most of the conspiracy sites/forums). The same people who pushed this savior of a plan — the 700 billion dollar bail out. Which, exactly, what has it done for us? When yesterday, after the bailout became law, the Dow Jones PLUNGED.
And today?
Well, according to CNN… CNN: A 5-year low - U.S. stocks clobbered for 2nd straight day, with Dow losing 500 points, as investor gloom persists. And right on the front page below that link it states:“Wall Street’s drubbing continued today, with a 500-point loss bringing the Dow’s two-day scalding to nearly 900 points, as the Federal Reserve’s plan to loosen credit markets failed to counter investor pessimism about the government’s ability to rescue the markets. The Fed chief’s dour outlook in a speech added to the weakness, CNNMoney.com reports.”
In the words of the intelligent Texas Congressman and ex-presidential candidate, Doctor Ron Paul, “there goes your country” (because didn’t I mention on this blog before how the stock market and Wall Street ARE America?). Also, most Americans didn’t want it, and all of America got it anyway. That’s democracy for you! Beautiful, isn’t it?
I’d also like to add to that quote from Ron Paul with my own words: “and here comes the one world government” — because, isn’t that how I got started with this subject? The world economy. But before I get into that, I want to show more of Ron Paul (BECAUSE WELCOME TO MY BLOG, THE SOMETIMES ECHO CHAMBER OF RON PAUL AND ALL OTHER THINGS I AGREE WITH).
Ron Paul On The Passage of the Bailout
Description:“Congressman Ron Paul gives us his thoughts on the passage of the bailout bill just minutes after leaving the floor.”
And here is the speech he made on the House floor that he mentioned in the above video:
RON PAUL ON BAILOUT
Description:“Just before the passage of the historic 700 Billion bailout bill passed by Congress, Ron Paul explained why he was voting against the bill. This is not an endorsement or criticism of Ron Paul - just food for thought. I watched most of the debate before the vote and Paul was one of the more interesting speakers. If you have a funny feeling that something is out of whack in the economic freak out going on around the world, this may make some sense. But then again, maybe not. Depends on you!
He said: “Madam Speaker I rise in strong opposition to this bill because it won’t solve our problem…””
Here’s another good video from Doctor Ron Paul:
Ron Paul Says Bailout Law Is Morally Wrong
Description:“CNSNews.com asked Ron Paul whether forcing taxpayers to bailout deadbeat mortgage holders was just or unjust. (By: Nicholas Ballasy and Jon Schulter)”
I really, really love this man. For more of what he’s about, and more of his words, check out:http://campaignforliberty.com — one of the sites I go to daily (and surprisingly, it’s not a conspiracy site…?!)
ANYWAY… this post is going on LONG ENOUGH. So I’m going to wrap this up quick with what I wanted to post to begin with:
And there are so SO SOOOO many other sources than these — some that I saw earlier and can not find now (don’t you hate that, when you have a source and then you lose it and can’t find it again?). You can probably just do a quick Google search about the economy and find probably a ton load more — even probably some of the ones I saw earlier but can’t find now. Or you can take my word on it. Your choice.
Anyway, onto my point… My point is: Is it really just a coincidence that this is happening all around the world at ONCE? Why is no one bringing this up — that this is a crisis that is hitting the globe, and not just America and that when the bail out wasn’t passed the first time in America, world leaders started to get upset and make speeches about how the bail out is right for America — excuse me, what business of it is Europe’s what America does with our economy? — unless of course a one world is where we’re headed.
How dense can you be not to see this? Not to be suspicious of it?
ANYWAY… . . . . I’m going to finish this post up. I guess the economy was the first and ONLY order of business in this post, but it’s good to be back here and HELLO AGAIN EVERYONE! I promise to post some more from now on.
OH, OKAY, WAIT, ONE MORE THING… . . .
Did everyone know that there is a second Zeitgeist movie out? I couldn’t stand the first Zeitgeist movie, but as Tom tells me, the second one is a LOT better. I haven’t seen it yet, but here it is anyway… :
I hold all judgments until I see it, and when I see it I’ll post something about it here. But I still hold onto my beliefs about the first Zeitgeist movie, and also think that if you really want to see the truth about the New World Order and our future, that the documentary “Historic Interview with Aaron Russo, Fighting Cancer and the New World Order” is a LOT better to watch than the first Zeitgeist.
ANYWAY!!! ALL COMMENTS ARE WELCOMED AND THANKS FOR READING.
I’m sure if you even just GLIMPSED at the television today you’ll see that one of the things that is DOMINATING the news is the Vice Presidential Candidate Debate that’s going to happen tonight between Sarah Palin and Joe Biden.
And one of the main issues surrounding this debate? Whether or not Sarah Palin should be treated differently then if she were a male. I kid you not, this is ONE OF THE BIG ISSUES OF THE DEBATE. Should Joe Biden treat Sarah Palin with chivalry?! I actually heard a journalist ask this on television.
And women are falling right into the trap of it — the trap of not knowing why this was brought up and actually discussing it like it matters. They are not thinking outside the box. Watching the news today, I saw CNN interviewing women that were saying they were offended that this was even brought up, and that Sarah Palin should be treated just like any candidate. And while I agree with them, I think this should go without saying. I shook my head, feeling disgusted, watching these women who were offended that this was even brought up by the news media.
First of all, my main question for these women who feel offended that this is even an issue: Are they Obama supporters? My money is betting that they are. Because this “issue” (if we can call it that) seems like an extremely clever ploy presented to the American voters by the McCain campaign. Why? Because the McCain campaign recognizes that, for all our cries for “gender equality”, American women deep down will be disgusted and turned off by any rough treatment towards another women. This problem was presented for the women who were once Hilary Clinton supporters, but are now McCain supports for the mere FACT that he has a woman on the ballot. This problem was presented for swing voters who have a TOUCH of old school feelings about women in them — which most Americans do.
And now, instead of focusing on the true issues at hand (not that debates ever really do that to begin with), we have to worry about a petty problem — was Joe Biden too rough on Sarah Palin? Was he a gentlemen? Was he kind enough to his opponent that we can over look the fact that he even went up against a woman in the first place?
I beg you all to ignore the gender issue here. Humans are people first and a gender second. Let’s not make this debate about something it’s not.
And as for the women who are saying they are offended, please realize that even discussing this in a way to say that you ARE offended is saying too much. You females are playing right into the hands of the media. It shouldn’t even be an issue. Shouldn’t even be something to be worked up about. The more people talk about it, the more it will overshadow some real problems that this country has. Feel nothing about it, say nothing about it, it’s a non-issue. Sit there blank faced when someone brings it up and be aloof — because that would be the right response.
It disgusts me that most Americans are falling into the trap.
My aunt said to me once me that McCain was smart to pick Sarah Palin as his Vice President, because Obama and Biden will look like scum bags ripping her apart — even more so then if they would have done to Hilary Clinton. And I have to say I agree with her. But I don’t think it’s a good thing that we are stuck in this mentality. Her gender should have no bearing on the political situation. And yet it does.
Wake up America. Stop letting petty things dominant your views, or overshadow more important things. This is what politicians and the media wants.
Even me writing this is too much — but at least I feel like I’m speaking the truth about it. It should be the NON-issue. Instead this will eat up more time then it should. What a shame. And what a way to further place a divide between males and females, as well.
Description:“theantirobot is an online collective working to distribute global domination capabilities to every individual.
Global domination capability is dependent upon control of resources. Thus, we must work to ensure each individual retains the maximum control of resources. Political change is the first most effective venue in that regard.
Achieving political victory is heavily reliant on voters’ exposure to candidates. Established media outlets wield heavy influence upon the political process. For citizens, bypassing that influence is as easy as not looking. Politicians, however, are left in a bind. The mainstream population still conforms to the old media, while access to politicians is all that gives old media mainstream influence.
When people and politicians embrace the free web, political success is not dependent on vast sums of money or how much airtime news networks allot. It is dependent on how compelling the platform is. It is dependent on how compelling the supporters are.
Social Media enables the vocal minority to become the majority. We the people, we the politicians, we the journalists, theantirobot is taking over.”
“G Edward Griffin - Creature From Jekyll Island A Second Look at the Federal Reserve”
This man explains exactly what the Federal Reserve is, how it came to be, where it originated, what it does and what it’s purpose is. Some of the things he mentions, like exactly why we try to be humanitarian and help other countries, are really just there to help the banks and how it’s all a scam. Please watch this and be informed. It’s only 42 minutes of your time.
Description: “G Edward Griffin explains the FEDERAL RESERVE - a total money scam. Ron Paul will reverse this!”
This video really breaks down the Federal Reserve in a way it never has been before. It’s very easy to understand for the layman — like most of us here, including myself.
Why aren’t we enraged, America? This video also talks about why we should not be dependent on the state for our money system — even though we currently are.
At 34 minutes in he explains how the bankers and politicians get away with doing these things, and says, PRETTY MUCH, that they use propaganda against us and tell us not to be too informed and NOT TO ROCK THE BOAT —- I’ll tell you what. I’ll get this boat rocking if everyone ends up standing up with me to rock it.
“NO BAILOUT” “YOU BROKE IT YOU BUY IT” Wall Street Protest
Description:“Wall Street Protest”
People protest wall street bailout!!!
Description:“Demonstrators Rally on Wall St. Against Federal Bailout
As President Bush was holding an emergency economic summit at the White House, protesters took to the streets across the country to oppose a Wall Street bailout. In New York, a series of demonstrations occurred near the Stock Exchange.”
I think I might go to the next New York City bailout protest on October 1st.
And just so everyone knows, I do not believe that socialism is the answer, like the description in the third video seems to suggest. That’s the anti-solution to this. I just wanted to make that clear. I just wanted to copy and paste the third Youtube description for everyone to read, in case they were interested.
WALL ST. BAILOUT PROTEST SEPT 25, 2008 NYC
Description: Wall Street area protest against bailout of investment banks
Those are his first two videos. And now this is the third about what is going on more recently in the stock markets since the bailout didn’t go through.
I mean, I have to agree with this man. Everyone rushing home for the Jewish holiday? Is this how important it is, that the people supposedly working to get this fixed have to take a day or two off for Rosh Hashanah? I mean.. the markets aren’t closing tomorrow, so why should the supposed self proclaimed saviors of the markets take time off?
This man also talks about, as the subject stated, what the news is saying about the failed bailout, and why the news is wrong, and how the rest of the world is looking at us now. He also reads and cites articles from 2006 and 2007 that are related to this — one of them being SHOCKING.
